Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to content

MODFLOW-NWT model used in simulation of groundwater flow and availability in the North Fork Red River aquifer, southwest Oklahoma, 1980-2013

Metadata Updated: October 26, 2023

In 2017 the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Oklahoma Water Resources Board, published a calibrated numerical groundwater-flow model and associated model documentation report that evaluated the effects of potential groundwater withdrawals on groundwater flow and availability in the North Fork Red River aquifer in southwest Oklahoma. The results of groundwater-availability scenarios run on the calibrated numerical groundwater-flow model could be used by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board to reevaluate the maximum annual yield of groundwater from the North Fork Red River aquifer in Oklahoma. The numerical groundwater-flow model was built on a hydrogeologic framework and a conceptual groundwater-flow model derived from previously published and newly collected hydrologic data. A hydrogeologic framework is a three-dimensional representation of the aquifer and the surrounding geologic units at a scale that captures the regional controls on groundwater flow. The hydrogeologic framework for the North Fork Red River aquifer included a definition of the aquifer extent and potentiometric surface, as well as a description of the textural and hydraulic properties of aquifer materials. A conceptual groundwater-flow model is a simplified description of the major inflow and outflow sources (hydrologic boundaries) of a groundwater-flow system as well as an accounting of the estimated mean flows from those sources (water budget) for a specified period of time. The hydrogeologic framework and conceptual model are necessary constraints used in the construction and calibration of a scientifically defensible numerical groundwater-flow model that reasonably represents the groundwater-flow system.

  A finite-difference numerical groundwater-flow model of the North Fork Red River aquifer was constructed by

using MODFLOW-2005 with the Newton formulation solver (MODFLOW-NWT). Data inputs for each package were specified in machine-readable text files. The numerical model of the North Fork Red River aquifer had 385 rows, 460 columns, about 27,600 active cells of 886 by 886 ft (270 by 270 meters), and 2 convertible layers. The top layer (layer 1) represented the undifferentiated Quaternary alluvium and terrace deposits with variable thickness determined from the hydrogeologic framework, and the bottom layer (layer 2) represented the Permian bedrock with a nominal thickness of about 100 feet. The model active area was created from the North Fork Red River aquifer extent and expanded in some areas to ensure that each active cell was in connection with at least one other active cell. One terrace lobe in northern Beckham County was not included in the model active area because it was almost separated spatially and hydraulically from the rest of the North Fork Red River aquifer. The numerical model was temporally discretized into 408 monthly transient stress periods (each with 2 time steps) representing the period 1980–2013. An initial steady-state stress period, in which the groundwater-flow equation had no storage component, represented mean annual inflows to and outflows from the aquifer and produced a solution that was used as the initial condition for subsequent transient stress periods. The numerical model was constructed in units of meters and days. This USGS data release contains all of the input and output files for the simulations described in the associated model documentation report (https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175098).

Access & Use Information

Public: This dataset is intended for public access and use. License: No license information was provided. If this work was prepared by an officer or employee of the United States government as part of that person's official duties it is considered a U.S. Government Work.

Downloads & Resources

Dates

Metadata Created Date June 1, 2023
Metadata Updated Date October 26, 2023

Metadata Source

Harvested from DOI EDI

Additional Metadata

Resource Type Dataset
Metadata Created Date June 1, 2023
Metadata Updated Date October 26, 2023
Publisher U.S. Geological Survey
Maintainer
@Id http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/6224aef87bca63880daa16164a79d1c2
Identifier USGS:d34e3086-129b-42fd-8615-8baa79a9e41d
Data Last Modified 20201117
Category geospatial
Public Access Level public
Bureau Code 010:12
Metadata Context https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.jsonld
Metadata Catalog ID https://datainventory.doi.gov/data.json
Schema Version https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
Catalog Describedby https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
Harvest Object Id 8c0a87d0-cb68-4634-9a18-adbed006a166
Harvest Source Id 52bfcc16-6e15-478f-809a-b1bc76f1aeda
Harvest Source Title DOI EDI
Metadata Type geospatial
Old Spatial -100.24085,34.56934,-98.8713,35.51279
Publisher Hierarchy White House > U.S. Department of the Interior > U.S. Geological Survey
Source Datajson Identifier True
Source Hash 876356a58a728f36b71629c3d0775a7a9a372bb01acd341f977c07c57042f346
Source Schema Version 1.1
Spatial {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": -100.24085, 34.56934, -100.24085, 35.51279, -98.8713, 35.51279, -98.8713, 34.56934, -100.24085, 34.56934}

Didn't find what you're looking for? Suggest a dataset here.