Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to content

SWAT Reach Output Seasonal Change Scenarios for: Modeling Future Land Cover and Water Quality Change in Minneapolis, MN, USA to Support Drinking Water Source Protection Decisions

Metadata Updated: July 15, 2024

We developed four 2011-2050 land cover change scenarios and modeled the impact of projected land cover change on influent water quality to support long-term planning for the city of Minneapolis, MN. Baseline land cover was from the NLCD2011 database. IPCC SRES scenarios (https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/sres-en.pdf) interpreted by Sohl et al. (2014) (https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1245.1) for the conterminous United States were downscaled from 250 meters to 30 meters. The baseline and scenario land cover data were used as input into the Soil Water and Assessment Tool (SWAT) model to assess the effect of outyear projected land cover change on the source of raw water for the city of Minneapolis, MN. SWAT was used to assess the effect of land cover change on raw water concentrations of sediment, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus. The IPCC SRES evaluated were A1B, A2, B1, and B2. The four scenarios were implemented with (A1Bf) and without (A1B) forest recovery (e.g., conversion of cropland (2011) to forest (2050).

    Units for the MeanDifference variable are different for TN/TP and sediment due to SWAT reporting conventions; TN and TP are in kilograms (kg) and sediment is in megagrams (Mg).  1 Mg = 1,000 kg.  Differences are scenario minus baseline; negative values indicate constituent loads were less for the scenario relative to the baseline.  NLCD2001 was included as a scenario to assess the effect of land cover change.  Negative values for the NLCD2001 scenario indicate that a constituent load was less in 2001 relative to 2011.

Access & Use Information

License: No license information was provided. If this work was prepared by an officer or employee of the United States government as part of that person's official duties it is considered a U.S. Government Work.

Downloads & Resources

Dates

Metadata Date March 20, 2023
Metadata Created Date July 15, 2024
Metadata Updated Date July 15, 2024
Reference Date(s) March 3, 2023 (publication)
Frequency Of Update

Metadata Source

Harvested from Environmental Dataset Gateway ISO Geospatial Metadata

Additional Metadata

Resource Type Dataset
Metadata Date March 20, 2023
Metadata Created Date July 15, 2024
Metadata Updated Date July 15, 2024
Reference Date(s) March 3, 2023 (publication)
Responsible Party U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment (Publisher)
Contact Email
Guid 929385C8-6763-4988-B388-680BCD9E008A
Access Constraints https://edg.epa.gov/EPA_Data_License.html
Bbox East Long 47
Bbox North Lat 47
Bbox South Lat -87
Bbox West Long -88
Coupled Resource
Frequency Of Update
Harvest Object Id 47cfba42-42b8-48c0-bc06-4e32d335938b
Harvest Source Id 9b3cd81e-5515-4bb7-ad3c-5ae44de9b4bd
Harvest Source Title Environmental Dataset Gateway ISO Geospatial Metadata
Licence None
Lineage Land cover modeling was done in a GIS environment using the NLCD2011 database (Homer et al. 2015. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 81:345-354); SWAT is a spatial water quality model. Map coordinates are based on an Albers conical equal area projection. Projection parameters: false_easting (0.0); false_northing (0.0); central meridian (-96.0); standard parallel 1 (29.50); standard parallel 2 (49.50); latitude of origin (23.0); linear unit (meter); geographic coordinate system (GCS North American 1983); datum (D North American 1983); prime meridian (Greenwich); angular unit (degree). Watershed area is approximately 50,000 sq. km.
Metadata Language eng
Metadata Type geospatial
Old Spatial {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [[[-88.0, -87.0], [47.0, -87.0], [47.0, 47.0], [-88.0, 47.0], [-88.0, -87.0]]]}
Progress
Spatial Data Service Type
Spatial Reference System EPSG:4326
Spatial Harvester True
Temporal Extent Begin 2022-02-23T08:00:00

Didn't find what you're looking for? Suggest a dataset here.