Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to content

GeoRePORT Case Studies - Coso, WSMR, Dixie Valley, and Chena Hot Springs

Metadata Updated: June 25, 2021

The Geothermal Resource Portfolio Optimization and Reporting Technique (GeoRePORT) was developed with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Office to assist in identifying and pursuing long-term investment strategies through the development of a resource reporting protocol. GeoRePORT provides scientists and nonscientists a comprehensive and quantitative means of reporting: (1) features intrinsic to geothermal sites (project grade) and (2) maturity of the development (project readiness). Because geothermal feasibility is not determined by any single factor (e.g., temperature, permeability, permitting), a site?s project grade and readiness are evaluated on 12 attributes pertaining to geological, technical, or socio-economic feasibility. In this paper, we present case studies showing how GeoRePORT can be used to compare geological, technical, and socio-economic attributes between geothermal systems. The consistent and objective assessment protocols used in GeoRePORT allow for comparison of project attributes across unique locations and geological settings. GeoRePORT case studies presented here outline the geological, socio-economic, and technical features of four individual geothermal sites: Coso, Chena, Dixie Valley, and White Sands Missile Range. The case studies illustrate the usefulness of GeoRePORT in evaluating project risk and return, identifying gaps in reported data, evaluating R&D impact, and gathering insights on successes and failures as applicable to future projects.

Access & Use Information

Public: This dataset is intended for public access and use. License: Creative Commons Attribution

Downloads & Resources

Dates

Metadata Created Date June 24, 2021
Metadata Updated Date June 25, 2021

Metadata Source

Harvested from OpenEI data.json

Additional Metadata

Resource Type Dataset
Metadata Created Date June 24, 2021
Metadata Updated Date June 25, 2021
Publisher National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Maintainer
Doi 10.15121/1572362
Identifier https://data.openei.org/submissions/3820
Data First Published 2019-09-30T06:00:00Z
Data Last Modified 2019-10-30T17:13:34Z
Public Access Level public
Bureau Code 019:20
Metadata Context https://openei.org/data.json
Metadata Catalog ID https://openei.org/data.json
Schema Version https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
Catalog Describedby https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
Data Quality True
Harvest Object Id 4d5adea9-5d82-4bfd-a261-da586b51d479
Harvest Source Id 7cbf9085-0290-4e9f-bec1-91653baeddfd
Harvest Source Title OpenEI data.json
Homepage URL https://gdr.openei.org/submissions/1178
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Old Spatial {"type":"Polygon","coordinates":-167.7267,13.518,-53.8316,13.518,-53.8316,75.0714,-167.7267,75.0714,-167.7267,13.518}
Program Code 019:006
Projectlead Mike Weathers
Projectnumber FY19 AOP 4675
Projecttitle GeoRePORT Protocols and Case Studies
Source Datajson Identifier True
Source Hash 90ac29ca9d04d12d1d034d3c92ab91c0131a8c09
Source Schema Version 1.1
Spatial {"type":"Polygon","coordinates":-167.7267,13.518,-53.8316,13.518,-53.8316,75.0714,-167.7267,75.0714,-167.7267,13.518}

Didn't find what you're looking for? Suggest a dataset here.