Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to content

Try the next-generation Data Catalog at catalog-beta.data.gov and help shape it with your feedback.

Base flow estimation via optimal hydrograph separation at CONUS watersheds and comparison to the National Hydrologic Model - Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System by HRU calibrated version

Metadata Updated: January 20, 2026

Optimal hydrograph separation (OHS) is a two-component, hydrograph separation method that uses a two-parameter, recursive digital filter (RDF) constrained via chemical mass balance to estimate the base flow contribution to a stream or river (Rimmer and Hartman, 2014; Raffensperger et al., 2017). A recursive digital filter distinguishes between high-frequency and low-frequency discharge data within a hydrograph, where high-frequency data corresponds to quick flow or storms and low-frequency data corresponds to base flow. The two parameters within the RDF are alpha and beta, both are unitless. Alpha is defined as the recession constant and typically found through recession analysis. For the purposes of this data release and study, we derived alpha from a groundwater flow coefficient (gwflow_coef) defined in the National Hydrologic Model Infrastructure run with the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (NHM-PRMS) (Regan et al., 2018). The second parameter, beta, is defined as the maximum value of the base flow index (Eckhardt, 2005). Beta is optimized using specific conductance and mass balance techniques, where a hydrograph is split into quick flow and base flow and specific conductance values are proposed for these streamflow components. OHS uses two model types to estimate base flow specific conductance from stream specific conductance, referred to as 'SCfit' and 'sin-cos' model types. The 'SCfit' model type uses a peak-fitting algorithm to define time periods where the stream is entirely comprised of base flow, whereas the 'sin-cos' model type emulates seasonal variation in streamflow specific conductance with a sine-cosine function to pinpoint when base flow contributes to streamflow. For more information and equations regarding model type and OHS methods, please see the associated publication (Foks et al., 2019). OHS was applied to 1076 stream gages within the conterminous United States (CONUS) where daily streamflow and daily or discrete measurements of specific conductance were collected. Gages were selected for this method if they were of "reference quality" as defined by the Geospatial Attributes of Gages for Evaluating Streamflow (GAGES-II) dataset (Falcone, 2011). Of these 1076 sites, 825 had "successful" OHS models - implying good agreement between observed and simulated stream specific conductance. This data release contains the results of applying OHS to hundreds of stream gages of varying watershed characteristics, summary of watershed and hydro-climatological characteristics for each site (Falcone, 2011; USGS, 2003), and a comparison of OHS-defined base flow to base flow -analogous flow components within the NHM-PRMS (gwres_flow and slow_flow) (Regan et al., 2018; Regan et al., 2019). For this data release and study, comparisons of OHS-defined base flow were made to the "by HRU" calibration of the NHM-PRMS (Hay, 2019).

Access & Use Information

Public: This dataset is intended for public access and use. License: No license information was provided. If this work was prepared by an officer or employee of the United States government as part of that person's official duties it is considered a U.S. Government Work.

Downloads & Resources

Dates

Metadata Created Date January 11, 2026
Metadata Updated Date January 20, 2026

Metadata Source

Harvested from DOI USGS DCAT-US

Additional Metadata

Resource Type Dataset
Metadata Created Date January 11, 2026
Metadata Updated Date January 20, 2026
Publisher U.S. Geological Survey
Maintainer
Identifier http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_5cc8cb7ae4b09b8c0b77f3ae
Data Last Modified 2020-08-20T00:00:00Z
Category geospatial
Public Access Level public
Bureau Code 010:12
Metadata Context https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.jsonld
Metadata Catalog ID https://ddi.doi.gov/usgs-data.json
Schema Version https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
Catalog Describedby https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
Datagov Dedupe Retained 20260120105240
Harvest Object Id b6d1ce57-4f37-4378-ae03-4661a88da9c7
Harvest Source Id 2b80d118-ab3a-48ba-bd93-996bbacefac2
Harvest Source Title DOI USGS DCAT-US
Metadata Type geospatial
Old Spatial {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": -125.4199, 24.2870, -125.4199, 49.2104, -66.6211, 49.2104, -66.6211, 24.2870, -125.4199, 24.2870}
Source Datajson Identifier True
Source Hash 69afb9f3391271562d765304f1a50ba3529fbaf3297def5af0863156e61f0c9e
Source Schema Version 1.1
Spatial {"type": "Polygon", "coordinates": -125.4199, 24.2870, -125.4199, 49.2104, -66.6211, 49.2104, -66.6211, 24.2870, -125.4199, 24.2870}

Didn't find what you're looking for? Suggest a dataset here.