The work presented in this report advances the goals of the U.S. Department of Energy Building America program by improving the energy peformance of affordable and market-rate housing. Southface Energy Institute (Southface), part of the U.S. Department of Energy Building America research team Partnership for Home Innovation, worked with owners and builders with various market constraints and ultimate goals for three projects in three climate zones (CZs): Savannah Gardens in Savannah, Georgia (CZ 2); JMC Patrick Square in Clemson, South Carolina (CZ 3); and LaFayette in LaFayette, Georgia (CZ 4). This report documents the design process, computational energy modeling, construction, envelope performance metrics, long-term monitoring results, and successes and failures of the design and execution of these highperformance homes. The JMC Patrick Square project is a single floor with 1,828 ft2 of conditioned living space, three bedrooms, two bathrooms, and an attached two-car garage. This small-scale production builder wanted to increase its level of energy efficiency beyond its current green building practices, including bringing ducts into conditioned space. The team met this goal through a combination of upgrade measures and achieved many Zero Energy Ready Home program requirements. Monitoring the four ducted HPWHs in LaFayette and one in Savannah revealed that HPWH exhaust air impacts attic air during HPWH runtime only, and attic conditions return to previous levels shortly after the HPWH turns off. The HPWH did not appear to impact the loads on the heating and cooling systems, which were also placed in the attic. HPWHs should not be considered dehumidifiers if one is needed in an attic or basement/crawlspace. Ducting the HPWHs did not negatively impact performance compared to other published data of field performance. Changing duct configurations also did not alter the coefficient of performance. HPWHs in efficiency mode (heat pump only) could satisfy hot water demand for most residents. This mode maximizes energy efficiency. Adding .5 in. of insulated sheathing using the Huber ZIP System R Sheathing reduced peak summer temperatures and increased minimum winter temperatures inside the wall assemblies compared to the neighboring home. The neighboring home experienced significantly more risk of condensation and failed the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Standard 160-2009: Criteria for Moisture-Control Design Analysis in Buildings. Despite the fact that energy modeling predicted only a 2% annual savings from the insulated sheathing, preliminary data indicate that reduced heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning runtimes and energy consumption attributed to this measure provide significantly greater savings. Additional research is necessary.