{"@type": "dcat:Dataset", "accessLevel": "public", "bureauCode": ["009:25"], "contactPoint": {"@type": "vcard:Contact", "fn": "NIH", "hasEmail": "mailto:info@nih.gov"}, "description": "Introduction:\n          In this review, we compare the spectrum of currently available\t\t\t\tmethods for quantifying pulmonary edema in patients.\n        \n        \n          Review:\n          Imaging and indicator dilution techniques comprise the most common\t\t\t\tstrategies for measuring lung water at the bedside. The most accurate (within\t\t\t\t10% of the gravimetric gold standard) and most reproducible (< 5%\t\t\t\tbetween-test variation) are also, unfortunately, the most expensive and most\t\t\t\tdifficult to implement for purposes of large-scale clinical trials or for\t\t\t\troutine clinical practice.\n        \n        \n          Conclusion:\n          The standard chest radiograph remains the best screening test for\t\t\t\tthe detection of pulmonary edema. Indicator-dilution techniques are probably\t\t\t\tthe best available method at present for quantitation in patient groups.", "distribution": [{"@type": "dcat:Distribution", "description": "Visit the original government dataset for complete information, documentation, and data access.", "downloadURL": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137228/", "mediaType": "text/html", "title": "Official Government Data Source"}], "identifier": "https://healthdata.gov/api/views/nusx-fpru", "issued": "2025-07-14", "keyword": ["imaging-techniques", "indicator-dilution", "lung-water", "nih", "pulmonary-edema"], "landingPage": "https://healthdata.gov/d/nusx-fpru", "modified": "2025-09-06", "programCode": ["009:032"], "publisher": {"@type": "org:Organization", "name": "National Institutes of Health"}, "theme": ["NIH"], "title": "The measurement of lung water"}