{"accessLevel": "public", "bureauCode": ["010:12"], "contactPoint": {"@type": "vcard:Contact", "fn": "Diann J. Prosser", "hasEmail": "mailto:dprosser@usgs.gov"}, "description": "While small unmanned aerial systems (UAS) present a unique opportunity to survey avian populations while limiting disturbance, relatively little is known about how this method compares with more traditional approaches. In this study we compared population estimates of a mixed-species egret colony in the Chesapeake Bay (Maryland, USA) derived from UAS photo counts, flush counts, flight-line surveys, and in-colony nest counts along with the time required to derive an estimate via each approach. These data support a larger USGS manuscript.", "distribution": [{"@type": "dcat:Distribution", "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.5066/P94M6F3B", "description": "Landing page for access to the data", "format": "XML", "mediaType": "application/http", "title": "Digital Data"}, {"@type": "dcat:Distribution", "description": "The metadata original format", "downloadURL": "https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/metadata/USGS.605b4c5ed34e18948834369d.xml", "format": "XML", "mediaType": "text/xml", "title": "Original Metadata"}], "identifier": "http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/USGS_605b4c5ed34e18948834369d", "keyword": ["Cattle Egret", "UAS", "USGS:605b4c5ed34e18948834369d", "biota", "drone", "flight-line survey", "flush count", "nest count", "survey methods"], "modified": "2022-07-21T00:00:00Z", "publisher": {"@type": "org:Organization", "name": "U.S. Geological Survey"}, "spatial": "-76.40717, 38.73159, -76.35361, 38.78620", "theme": ["geospatial"], "title": "Comparing various survey methods for estimating the number of colonial nesting white egret pairs"}