{"@type": "dcat:Dataset", "accessLevel": "public", "bureauCode": ["011:21"], "contactPoint": {"@type": "vcard:Contact", "fn": "Open Data Office of Justice Programs (USDOJ)", "hasEmail": "mailto:opendata@usdoj.gov"}, "dataQuality": false, "description": "This study was undertaken to examine the compatibility of\r\n law enforcement agency accreditation and community policing. It sought\r\n to answer the following questions: (1) Are accreditation and community\r\n policing compatible? (2) Do accreditation and community policing\r\n conflict? (3) Does accreditation support community policing? (4) Did\r\n any of this change with the 1994 \"top-down\" revision of the\r\n Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA)\r\n standards? To that end, the researchers conducted separate content\r\n analyses of the 897 accreditation standards of the Commission on\r\n Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) in effect at the\r\n end of 1992 and the revised set of 436 standards published in\r\n 1994. The standards were coded on 27 variables derived from the\r\n literature on community policing and police\r\n administration. Information was collected on the basics of each\r\n accreditation standard, its references to issues of community-oriented\r\n policing (COP) and problem-oriented policing (POP), and general\r\n information on its compatibility, or conflict with COP and POP. Basic\r\n variables cover standard, chapter, section, and\r\n applicability. Variables focusing on the compatibility of\r\n community-oriented policing and the accreditation standards include\r\n sources of legitimacy/authorization, community input, community\r\n reciprocity, geographic responsibility, and broadening of\r\n functions. Variables on problem-oriented policing include level of\r\n analysis, empirical analysis, collaboration with nonpolice agencies,\r\n evaluation/assessment, and nature of the problem. Variables on\r\n management and administration concern officer discretion,\r\n specialization by unit, specialization by task, formalization,\r\n centralization, levels/hierarchy, employee notification, employee\r\n involvement, employee rights, specific accountability, and customer\r\n orientation. General information on the compatibility or conflict\r\n between a standard and community-oriented policing/problem-oriented\r\n policing includes overall restrictiveness of the standard, primary\r\nstrategic affiliation, focus on process, and focus on administration.", "distribution": [{"@type": "dcat:Distribution", "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02560.v1", "title": "Community Policing and Police Agency Accreditation in the United States, 1992 and 1994"}], "identifier": "3418", "issued": "1999-11-19T00:00:00", "keyword": ["accreditation (institutions)", "community policing", "law enforcement agencies", "policies and procedures", "public interest"], "language": ["eng"], "license": "http://www.usa.gov/publicdomain/label/1.0/", "modified": "2006-03-30T00:00:00", "programCode": ["011:060"], "publisher": {"@type": "org:Organization", "name": "National Institute of Justice", "subOrganizationOf": {"acronym": "OJP", "id": 22, "name": "Office of Justice Programs", "parentOrganization": {"acronym": "DOJ", "id": 10, "name": "Department of Justice"}, "parentOrganizationID": 10}}, "title": "Community Policing and Police Agency Accreditation in the United States, 1992 and 1994"}