{"@type": "dcat:Dataset", "accessLevel": "public", "bureauCode": ["011:21"], "contactPoint": {"@type": "vcard:Contact", "fn": "Open Data Office of Justice Programs (USDOJ)", "hasEmail": "mailto:opendata@usdoj.gov"}, "dataQuality": false, "description": "This data collection, designed to improve the quality of\r\n children's testimony in court, evaluates how different types of\r\n interview formats affect the completeness and accuracy of children's\r\n recall performance. Specifically, the study assesses the impact of a\r\n \"practice interview\" about an event on the completeness and accuracy\r\n of later reports about a second, unrelated event. Three interview\r\n conditions were employed, and each condition consisted of both a\r\n practice interview and a target interview. The three conditions were\r\n RS, RC, and CC, where \"R\" represents a practice session with\r\n rapport-building only, \"S\" represents a target interview that\r\n contained all components of the standard interview procedure, and\r\n \"C\" represents either a practice or target interview that contained\r\n all components of the cognitive interview procedure. In\r\n rapport-building sessions, interviewers talked about school\r\n activities, family life, and favorite games with the child. In\r\n standard and cognitive interview sessions, the rapport-building\r\n sessions were followed by a request from the interviewer for the child\r\n to verbalize a narrative account of \"what happened\" during an event\r\n that had been previously staged by the experimenter. This narrative\r\n account was then followed by the interviewer's request for additional\r\n information about the event. Cognitive interviews also included\r\n several additional questions that were hypothesized to improve recall\r\n performance. The number of correct items recalled and the number of\r\n incorrect items generated were used to compare the performance of\r\nchildren in the three interview conditions.", "distribution": [{"@type": "dcat:Distribution", "accessURL": "https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09789.v1", "title": "Effects of Cognitive Interviewing, Practice, and Interview Style on Children's Recall Performance in California, 1989-1990  "}], "identifier": "2819", "issued": "1992-10-31T00:00:00", "keyword": ["children", "court cases", "courts", "testimony"], "language": ["eng"], "license": "http://www.usa.gov/publicdomain/label/1.0/", "modified": "2005-11-04T00:00:00", "programCode": ["011:060"], "publisher": {"@type": "org:Organization", "name": "National Institute of Justice", "subOrganizationOf": {"acronym": "OJP", "id": 22, "name": "Office of Justice Programs", "parentOrganization": {"acronym": "DOJ", "id": 10, "name": "Department of Justice"}, "parentOrganizationID": 10}}, "title": "Effects of Cognitive Interviewing, Practice, and Interview Style on Children's Recall Performance in California, 1989-1990  "}