Georgia - Industry-Led Skills and Workforce Development

Metadata Updated: June 25, 2021

The key evaluation questions for the ISWD project evaluation are as follows:

  1. How did the implemented PICG courses compare with the original grant proposals, and what were the reasons for any deviations?
  2. Did trainees enroll in PICG-supported courses and graduate from them at targeted levels?
  3. What were the labor market outcomes (employment and wages) for graduates from PICG-supported courses?
  4. What were employer perceptions of the graduates from the PICG-supported courses, and how did the availability of these graduates affect their hiring and training plans?
  5. Will PICG-supported courses be sustained after the compact?
  6. What are TVET providers' perceptions of the best practices identified and disseminated by the project, to what extent have they adopted them, and what are the main barriers to doing so?
  7. To what extent have the MES and its agencies adopted the policy reforms supported by the project, and what have been the main challenges in doing so?
  8. How and to what extent has the annual TVET conference influenced providers, employers, the MES, and other TVET sector stakeholders?

To answer these questions, we propose a mixed-methods performance evaluation, which will include two studies: (1) a quantitative outcomes study of Activity 1; and (2) a qualitative study assessing all project activities (Activities 1-4). To evaluate the possible effects of Activity 1, the outcomes study will measure the training and labor market outcomes of trainees in PICG-supported courses approximately one year after they graduate and, to the extent possible, compare those outcomes with those of a relevant sample of trainees who attended non-supported courses. The qualitative study will explore implementation of all the project activities, the potential mechanisms driving the results observed in the Activity 1 outcomes study, and the likelihood of sustainability across all ISWD initiatives after the compact ends.

Access & Use Information

Public: This dataset is intended for public access and use. License: See this page for license information.

Downloads & Resources


Metadata Created Date November 12, 2020
Metadata Updated Date June 25, 2021

Metadata Source

Harvested from MCC Data.json

Additional Metadata

Resource Type Dataset
Metadata Created Date November 12, 2020
Metadata Updated Date June 25, 2021
Publisher Millennium Challenge Corporation
Unique Identifier Unknown
Identifier DDI-MCC-GEO-EDU-ISWD-2017-v01
Data Last Modified 2017-08-29
Public Access Level public
Bureau Code 184:03
Metadata Context
Schema Version
Catalog Describedby
Harvest Object Id 0acf5e20-85b2-4340-b3a4-e85c092d0c8c
Harvest Source Id 23cd936b-e509-46f3-af7f-71c4ab01a514
Harvest Source Title MCC Data.json
Homepage URL
Program Code 184:000
Source Datajson Identifier True
Source Hash 4e5b07ad246338c752e5e700b89e907ec96b616b
Source Schema Version 1.1

Didn't find what you're looking for? Suggest a dataset here.