Does Council Tax Valuation Band (CTVB) correlate with Under-Privileged Area 8 (UPA8) score and could it be a better 'Jarman Index'?

Background Widespread scepticism persists on the use of the Under-Privileged Area (UPA8) score of Jarman in distributing supplementary resources to so-attributed 'deprived' UK general practices. The search for better 'needs' markers continues. Having already shown that Council Tax Valuation Band (CTVB) is a predictor of UK GP workload, we compare, here, CTVB of residence of a random sample of patients with their respective 'Jarman' scores. Methods Correlation coefficient is calculated between (i) the CTVB of residence of a randomised sample of patients from an English general practice and (ii) the UPA8 scores of the relevant enumeration districts in which they live. Results There is a highly significant correlation between the two measures despite modest study size of 478 patients (85% response). Conclusions The proposal that CTVB is a marker of deprivation and of clinical demand should be examined in more detail: it correlates with 'Jarman', which is already used in NHS resource allocation. But unlike 'Jarman', CTVB is simple, objective, and free of the problems of Census data. CTVB, being household-based, can be aggregated at will.

[
  "009:25"
]

{
  "fn": "NIH",
  "@type": "vcard:Contact",
  "hasEmail": "mailto:info@nih.gov"
}

[
  {
    "@type": "dcat:Distribution",
    "title": "Official Government Data Source",
    "mediaType": "text/html",
    "description": "Visit the original government dataset for complete information, documentation, and data access.",
    "downloadURL": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59897/"
  }
]

[
  "council-tax",
  "deprivation-index",
  "jarman-index",
  "nih",
  "upa8-score"
]

[
  "009:039"
]

{
  "name": "National Institutes of Health",
  "@type": "org:Organization"
}

[
  "NIH"
]