Design and Optimization of Space System Architectures: Applying and Extracting Lessons Learned

Metadata Updated: May 2, 2019

TABS 11.2.6, TABS 11.3.3, and TABS 11.4.2 call for improvements in tradespace exploration and analysis technology that takes advantage of model based system engineering approaches. These technologies would support mission design and other decision-making by 1) searching the space of decision variables and identifying Pareto optimal solutions and 2) identifying the key tradeoffs in the objectives and the driving decisions. Maturing these technologies is critical for system architecture design because the architecture has the largest impact on downstream decisions and on the system's performance, cost, risk flexibility, and other figures of merit. Specifically, NASA is interested in applying tradespace exploration and analysis technologies to distributed spacecraft missions (DSM). Designing DSMs are a challenge because of the large number of design variables and their complex interactions, many nonlinear constraints including power requirements and link budgets, multiple conflicting objectives of maximizing performance while minimizing cost and risk, and local optima present in the tradespace. System models are being developed to evaluate a system, but optimizing the architecture and understanding the tradespace remains difficult.

Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA) show promise as a decision-support tool, because they can solve problems that are non-linear, non-convex, and continuous or discrete. MOEAs have been used in tradeoff and sensitivity analyses by NASA, the Aerospace Corporation, and JAXA. MOEAs, however, are computationally inefficient because they rely on stochastic sampling of the decision space and do not leverage the knowledge of the problem structure or the domain. A more efficient optimization method is needed to handle the challenges associated with designing DSMs.

The proposed research will develop a knowledge-intensive optimization method that exploits expert-knowledge to explore the tradespace, much like how concurrent engineering design teams rely on expert experience. The knowledge-intensive optimization implements a multi-objective hyper-heuristic that adapts its search strategy to use an effective mix of codified expert knowledge and stochastic sampling.

To make sense of the possibly millions of solutions returned by the optimization, researchers are just beginning to develop tradespace analysis technologies that visualize the relationship between design variables and objectives. The proposed research will develop a knowledge-extraction module to produce a more compact summary of the driving decisions that lead to optimal solutions using association rule mining and classification trees. Association rule mining will identify the design decisions that have large impact, and the classification trees will use these design decisions and create a partially ordered list indicating their relative importance.

The proposed technologies will be demonstrated on DSM design case-studies to validate their efficacy.

Access & Use Information

Public: This dataset is intended for public access and use. License: U.S. Government Work

Downloads & Resources


Metadata Created Date August 1, 2018
Metadata Updated Date May 2, 2019

Metadata Source

Harvested from NASA Data.json

Additional Metadata

Resource Type Dataset
Metadata Created Date August 1, 2018
Metadata Updated Date May 2, 2019
Publisher Space Technology Mission Directorate
Unique Identifier TECHPORT_88533
Maintainer Email
Public Access Level public
Bureau Code 026:00
Metadata Context
Metadata Catalog ID
Schema Version
Catalog Describedby
Datagov Dedupe Retained 20190501230127
Harvest Object Id 039e2a36-49d9-407e-8685-acbc2690bc6b
Harvest Source Id 39e4ad2a-47ca-4507-8258-852babd0fd99
Harvest Source Title NASA Data.json
Data First Published 2020-08-01
Homepage URL
Data Last Modified 2018-07-18
Program Code 026:027
Source Datajson Identifier True
Source Hash 861daa16e77f3b48b394f93609c0977145142c5e
Source Schema Version 1.1

Didn't find what you're looking for? Suggest a dataset here.