Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to content

Process-structure-properties investigations for laser powder bed fused IN718 in the as-built condition

Metadata Updated: December 15, 2023

This data repository provides a central location for a body of work using one build of nickel-based alloy 718 (IN718) material and resulted in three different studies. The IN718 parts were manufactured by laser powder bed fusion using a range of laser energy densities (manipulation of processing variables) and orientations with respect to the build direction. The influence of processing variables on resulting grain structures, pore structures, and mechanical properties were studied in the as-built (not heat treated) condition. Some machining was completed to manufacture specific specimen geometries, while other specimens were left with rough as-built surfaces. All data associated with each of the three studies is included in this single data repository and organized into sub-folders. The three studies are briefly described below.The first study investigated the relationships among the high-cycle fatigue (HCF) life, surface roughness, and processing parameters. Standardized fatigue specimens were manufactured using 25 different sets of processing parameters by varying laser power, scan speed, layer thickness, and build orientation. Surface roughness measurements were conducted using white light interferometry; HCF life was measured; and fractography analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy. Build orientation affected HCF life due to the relationship between build orientation and surface roughness. Increasing surface roughness decreased the fatigue life due to increasing number of surface-crack initiation sites. For a fixed build orientation, the laser-energy density, outside of the optimal range, decreased the fatigue life due to lack-of-fusion pores at low laser-energy densities and more spherical pores at high laser-energy densities.The second study investigated the effects of build orientation and laser-energy density on the pore structure, microstructure, and tensile properties. Three different build conditions were selected from the original 25 in the previous study, namely, the conditions that resulted in the worst and best fatigue lifetimes: 0° build orientation and 38 J/mm3 laser-energy density, 0° build orientation and 62 J/mm3 laser-energy density, and 60° build orientation and 62 J/mm3 laser-energy density. In terms of microstructure, all three conditions exhibited a predominantly texture in the build direction, elongated grains and sub-grain boundaries. Build orientation (0° versus 60°) produced a difference in yield strength due to anisotropic grain morphology and effective grain size. The low laser-energy density specimens showed a significant decrease in all mechanical properties compared to the optimal laser-energy density specimens because the amount and size of the lack-of-fusion porosity.The third study chose to further down sample to only two materials conditions with the same laser energy density (62 J/mm3), but two build orientations (0° and 60°). The differences in processing parameters lead to subtle variations in pore networks and thus complicate the prediction of void-sensitive mechanical behaviors, including location of fracture. This study expands upon the void descriptor function (VDF), by accounting for interactions among neighboring pores and stress concentrations induced by non-spherical pores or voids. The modified VDF is evaluated against 120 computationally generated fracture simulations and six physical tensile specimens (three for each condition). The latter set of experiments, which include X-ray computed tomography measurements before and after deformation, enables evaluation against physically realistic and representative pores in AM metals. The modified VDF accurately predicts fracture location for 94 out of 120 simulated specimens. In the experimental data set, the modified VDF accurately predicts the location of fracture in four out of six specimens compared.

Access & Use Information

Public: This dataset is intended for public access and use. License: See this page for license information.

Downloads & Resources

References

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.06.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101425
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117464

Dates

Metadata Created Date December 15, 2023
Metadata Updated Date December 15, 2023
Data Update Frequency irregular

Metadata Source

Harvested from NIST

Additional Metadata

Resource Type Dataset
Metadata Created Date December 15, 2023
Metadata Updated Date December 15, 2023
Publisher National Institute of Standards and Technology
Maintainer
Identifier ark:/88434/mds2-3083
Data First Published 2023-10-31
Language en
Data Last Modified 2023-09-27 00:00:00
Category Materials:Materials characterization, Materials:Metals, Manufacturing:Additive manufacturing
Public Access Level public
Data Update Frequency irregular
Bureau Code 006:55
Metadata Context https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/data.json
Schema Version https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
Catalog Describedby https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
Harvest Object Id 3076c5da-5370-4496-b183-591711e2dace
Harvest Source Id 74e175d9-66b3-4323-ac98-e2a90eeb93c0
Harvest Source Title NIST
Homepage URL https://data.nist.gov/od/id/mds2-3083
License https://www.nist.gov/open/license
Program Code 006:045
Related Documents https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.06.003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101425, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117464
Source Datajson Identifier True
Source Hash 2de8141dc1ba115731bab78d3e3b4b65aa40aaf3479c52c76bf6f2a288cb9677
Source Schema Version 1.1

Didn't find what you're looking for? Suggest a dataset here.