Appendix: Summary of Benchmark City Comparison
o compare Austin’s diversion methodology and goals to those of its peers, Burns & McDonnell collected data from 13 benchmark cities regarding diversion calculation methods, recyclables processing contract terms, and policy implementation. Based on analysis on this compiled data, Burns & McDonnell determined various key findings based on a preliminary comparison, and comparisons of diversion material type considerations, methodology and policy considerations, and effective programming.
Find Related Datasets
Search by Tags
Click any tag below to search for similar datasets
Complete Metadata
| @type | dcat:Dataset |
|---|---|
| accessLevel | public |
| contactPoint |
{ "fn": "Austin Resource Recovery Management Pre-Approval Owner", "@type": "vcard:Contact", "hasEmail": "mailto:no-reply@data.austintexas.gov" } |
| description | o compare Austin’s diversion methodology and goals to those of its peers, Burns & McDonnell collected data from 13 benchmark cities regarding diversion calculation methods, recyclables processing contract terms, and policy implementation. Based on analysis on this compiled data, Burns & McDonnell determined various key findings based on a preliminary comparison, and comparisons of diversion material type considerations, methodology and policy considerations, and effective programming. |
| identifier | https://data.austintexas.gov/api/views/tccn-2ak5 |
| issued | 2023-11-13 |
| keyword |
[ "benchmark", "collections", "diversion", "recycling", "utilities", "waste collections" ] |
| landingPage | https://data.austintexas.gov/d/tccn-2ak5 |
| modified | 2023-11-21 |
| publisher |
{ "name": "data.austintexas.gov", "@type": "org:Organization" } |
| theme |
[ "Utilities and City Services" ] |
| title | Appendix: Summary of Benchmark City Comparison |
